“She’s BRACING for the FBI to Show Up” – Whitmer in FULL PANIC She’ll be RAIDED for Election FRAUD
And we’re back. And we’re back, y’all. Thank you for watching today. Go ahead and hit that like button, my people—you know that it helps us out a ton. And of course, it helps you because it allows us to keep bringing you these stories every day.
Now, y’all, the federal government’s battle with the state of Michigan, as it relates to all things election, is heating up. In this video, you’re going to see how the Trump administration is trying—trying—to ensure that the nation’s elections are fair and secure, but he’s getting some pushback from the states. And in this case, it’s Michigan, y’all.
Detroit and Michigan are pushing back on the Trump administration, setting up a showdown between the Gretchen Whitmer administration and one of the highest officials in the U.S. Department of Justice, Attorney Dylon.
So we’re going to see these two sides going back and forth, y’all. Of course, Trump says there was fraud in Michigan in 2020, and there have been many, many different investigations into that, with people coming out with some interesting fraud allegations.
We’ll take a look at that at the end of the video. But first, let’s look at the pending fight between Whitmer and Donald Trump’s U.S. attorney.
So, without further ado, let’s go ahead and get into it.
“If they can’t count the votes legally and honestly, then somebody else should take—”
“The Constitution. Here we go again. I mean, time and time again, we have shown the receipts that Donald Trump lost the 2020 election.”
Pushing back tonight, local officials are defending the accuracy of Detroit’s election results after the president claimed they were crooked and rigged. The president is doubling down on his calls to nationalize elections, and this time, he specifically mentioned Detroit.
Trump’s accusations of widespread voter fraud in places he lost in 2020—like right here in Michigan—have repeatedly been debunked, and leaders in the state are now overwhelmingly coming out to denounce his calls to nationalize elections in Detroit.
Experts say it’s not something the Constitution would even allow.
“If a state can’t run an election, I think the people behind me should do something about it.”
President Trump doubled down on comments this week that the federal government should take over federal elections in several Democratic-led cities, including Detroit.
“Go to 2020. Look at the facts that are coming out. Rigged, crooked elections. If we have areas—take a look at Detroit, Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Atlanta. Look at some of the places that had horrible corruption in elections. The federal government should not allow that. The federal government should get involved.”
Trump’s comments have sparked alarm among Democrats and political experts alike.
“Investigation after investigation has shown that the kind of widespread fraud the president claims did not occur.”
I spoke with political science professor Dave Dulio to get answers about whether what Trump is suggesting is even possible.
“Well, the Constitution is quite clear that the electoral process is up to the states. That is in plain language.”
So one of the main issues here is that the Constitution gives states wide latitude on how to conduct their elections—even when it’s for national office. And Donald Trump is trying to change that, y’all. He’s trying to bring more uniformity to the states, but the states are resistant.
And again, you’re about to see that there’s a true battle between the Trump administration and the Whitmer administration.
Many of Michigan’s Democrats have been pushing back at the president’s comments. Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, who oversaw the 2020 and 2024 elections in Michigan, spoke to CNN.
“This also feels like an effort to deter us from holding him accountable at the ballot box—either this fall or in 2028—by falsely suggesting that the federal government should have any role in overseeing elections.
Elections are run by the states. We do it very well, with integrity, securely and effectively, time and time again.”
Detroit City Clerk Janice Winfrey said:
“I must state what all Detroiters know to be true—Detroit has a history of fair and transparent elections, and any move to take over Detroit elections would be partisan politics at its worst.”
Governor Gretchen Whitmer added:
“Any attempt by the federal government to take over Michigan elections should be viewed as an attempt to take away Michiganders’ constitutional right to vote. It won’t happen on my watch.”
Many of Michigan’s Republicans have also responded. Congressman Tom Barrett said he does not support federalizing elections but does support serious election integrity reforms.
Meanwhile, Michigan’s Attorney General is rejecting a request from the U.S. Department of Justice to obtain ballots and voting materials from the Detroit area. The DOJ requested ballots, receipts, and envelopes from the 2024 election within two weeks.
Attorney General Dana Nessel responded, calling the claims of widespread voter fraud baseless and warning that state leaders are ready to defend against any attempt to interfere in Michigan’s elections.
In her letter, she wrote:
“Your request is premised on rejected claims and stale allegations unconnected to Wayne County’s 2024 election. It fails to set forth a factual basis sufficient to justify such demands.”
So yes, y’all—Michigan is rejecting the DOJ’s request.
Now, you might be wondering: has there been any credible allegation of fraud in Michigan?
One report noted that over $35 million in attempted fraud was stopped last year alone. That tells us something important—fraud does exist. But the purpose of these investigations is not to eliminate assistance—it’s to protect it. Because when fraud and waste go unchecked, public trust disappears. And when trust disappears, the programs meant to help the vulnerable are the first to suffer.
So in that spirit, investigations have focused on oversight—ensuring transparency, accountability, and protection of taxpayer funds.
